CS
CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORP (CSWC)·Q2 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 FY26 total investment income was $56.9M, up 1.8% q/q and ~16.9% y/y, beating consensus ($55.5M*) on stronger fee income and higher average investment balances .
- Net investment income per share (EPS proxy for BDCs) was $0.57 vs $0.581* consensus (slight miss) as interest expense rose to $16.0M and weighted average debt yield compressed to 11.5% (−30 bps q/q) .
- Originations accelerated: $245.5M of new commitments (7 new, 10 add-ons), signaling robust pipeline into year-end; 99% first-lien mix maintained and non‑accruals stayed low at 1.0% of FV .
- Balance sheet strengthened: issued $350M 5.95% notes due 2030; subsequently redeemed 2026 and 2028 notes with no make‑whole; pro forma regulatory leverage ~0.82x vs 0.91x reported .
- Board maintained monthly regular dividends of $0.1934 for Oct/Nov/Dec and a $0.06 supplemental in December ($0.64 total), supported by rising UTI of $1.13/share and continued equity gains .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record origination pace with $245.5M new commitments (7 new platforms, 10 add-ons) while keeping 99% of the credit book first-lien; management highlighted a robust sponsor pipeline and stable new-commitment spreads (~6.5%) .
- Capital structure de-risked and duration extended via $350M 2030 notes and redemption of 2026/2028 notes without make‑whole; management emphasized pro forma leverage back to ~0.82x and $719M of liquidity coverage for $334M unfunded commitments .
- Taxable earnings support improved: UTI rose to $1.13/share, aided by $3.5M realized equity gains; management reiterated confidence in continuing quarterly supplemental dividends .
What Went Wrong
- EPS miss vs consensus by ~$0.01 as interest expense increased to $16.0M (from $15.3M) and PIK contribution declined (4.9% of TII vs 5.8% prior quarter) .
- Portfolio yield edged down to 11.5% (−30 bps q/q), driven by a prior-quarter OID acceleration roll-off, slight spread compression, and modest non‑accrual impact per management .
- Net realized & unrealized losses of $6.4M reflected $10.3M of credit portfolio depreciation (partly offset by $5.7M equity appreciation), tempering the NAV benefit from ATM accretion .
Financial Results
Portfolio, balance sheet and dividend KPIs:
Consensus vs actuals and next quarter outlook:
*Values retrieved from S&P Global. EPS estimates based on “Primary EPS Consensus Mean”; Revenue based on “Revenue Consensus Mean”; # of estimates: EPS (Q2=6, Q3=5), Revenue (Q2=5, Q3=5).
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We generated pre‑tax net investment income of $0.61 per share…UTI balance to $1.13 per share…raised $350 million in 5.95% notes due 2030…redeemed our 2026 and 2028 notes…raised ~$40 million through our Equity ATM Program.” — Michael Sarner, CEO .
- “91% of the portfolio at fair value [is] rated in one of the top two categories…cash flow coverage…3.6x, the strongest level in the past three years…credit portfolio had a weighted average yield of 11.5%.” — Josh Weinstein, CIO .
- “Total investment income increased to $56.9 million…fees and other income up $1.3 million…PIK as a % of TII decreased to 4.9%…NAV per share at $16.62…liquidity is robust, with approximately $719 million.” — Chris Rehberger, CFO .
- “We’ve seen a significant uptick in the size of the pipeline…12/31 is probably going to look similar volume to 9/30.” — Michael Sarner, CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Pipeline and volume: Management anticipates Dec quarter originations similar to Sept and sees sustained sponsor activity; run‑rate originations shifting from $100–$125M to $150–$200M in a “normal” quarter .
- Credit quality and watch list: ~9% of portfolio below expectations but underwritten at lower leverage with strong covenant cushions; issues are idiosyncratic without clear industry correlation .
- Prepayments and spread environment: Prepayment risk mitigated by granularity; yields showed slight compression but remained within 5.5%–7.25% range on new deals; LTM prepayments ~10–12% vs 15–20% of assets rated “1” .
- Sector selectivity: Increased caution in healthcare and government‑funded models due to reimbursement/policy uncertainty; leaning on sponsor expertise and tighter structures/spreads when needed .
- Capital mix and rates: No major shift expected in mix of unsecured/secured/SBIC; SBIC will remain a key source in calendar 2026; target leverage 0.8x–0.95x with cushion for volatility .
Estimates Context
- Q2 FY26 revenue beat consensus (Actual $56.95M vs $55.51M*) while EPS (NII/share) modestly missed (Actual $0.57 vs $0.581*), likely reflecting higher interest expense ($16.0M) and lower PIK contribution, as well as small yield compression per management commentary .
- Near-term (Q3 FY26) Street looks for $57.37M* revenue and $0.563* EPS; management’s expectation for similar origination volume in Dec quarter and robust liquidity may support revenue, while spread compression and lower base rates could constrain EPS .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global (consensus).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Revenue momentum and fee income drove a top‑line beat; origination velocity and a healthy sponsor pipeline should sustain deployment into year‑end .
- Slight EPS miss was driven by higher interest expense and lower PIK/portfolio yield; watch interest expense trajectory and spread discipline as key EPS swing factors .
- Balance sheet durability improved materially: 2030 notes extend duration; 2026/2028 redemptions remove near‑term maturities; pro forma leverage back to ~0.82x within the 0.8–0.95x target .
- Credit quality remains solid (1.0% non‑accruals; 91% rated 1–2) with strong cash flow coverage (3.6x) and first‑lien focus (99%), reducing downside risk in a competitive lending market .
- UTI at $1.13/share and ongoing equity realizations support continued supplemental dividends alongside monthly regulars—an ongoing income catalyst .
- Yield headwinds are manageable: management cites stable new‑deal spreads (~6.5%) and portfolio granularity mitigating prepayment/yield dilution risk .
- Monitoring list: healthcare/government policy risk, base‑rate path, and any acceleration in credit depreciation vs equity appreciation that could pressure NAV and NII .